9A: Testing the Hypothesis
Mobile Pharmacy was my opportunity belief.
Who: Although numerous individuals might need
the service of transporting their medicine from pharmacies to their doorstep
with only a touch on their smartphones, some people may find it inconvenient
and unnecessary. These individuals could include young, energized, and with a leisure
life. Other people perhaps might find it worthless to pay a little extra for
their medicine or prescriptions to be delivered. As a result, I conducted five
interviews with individuals that do not have the need of a mobile pharmacy.
- · Interview 1: I decided to go to CVS to do a couple of interviews and buy some milk. I was able to speak to an older lady that was shopping around. I told her about my opportunity belief and what she thought about it. She paused for a minute to think about it and told me that although she might use it, she wouldn’t trust people to handle her medicine and prescription other than pharmacists. Maybe she was concerned and paranoid that someone would try use her medicine in a malevolent way.
- · Interview 2: My second interview was to a middle-age person that was shopping at CVS as well. I mentioned my idea to him and he found it inconvenient. He told me that he lives right around the corner therefore he thought it was unnecessary for him to spend extra money for this service.
- · Interview 3: I decided to go to Walgreens since it was right around the corner. I interviewed someone who apparently looked sick. I approached him and told him about my opportunity belief and what he thought about it. He told me that he wouldn’t really use it at all. He told me that he could just drive to a pharmacy and save a couple of dollars. This individual, though, appeared to be in his 20’s.
- · Interview 4: I decided to interview a cashier at Walgreens and told him about my idea. He mentioned that he wouldn’t really ever use it at all since he’s always working. He also stated that he doesn’t think a lot of people would buy it since customers just purchase one or two drugs that are not that expensive. He thought people wouldn’t spend an extra 30% of their purchase price to be delivered.
- · Interview 5: My last interview was conducted while I was working at Publix and saw one of the customers that had a prescription. I told her about my opportunity belief and what she thought about it. She said that she really wouldn’t use that service since she just could come to Publix to do grocery shopping and at the same time grab her prescriptions.
What: I believe
the need of having your medicine and prescriptions delivered does not differ
from other delivery needs such as pizza or grocery deliveries. Deliveries provide
convenience and save substantial time to people who might not have a lot of it.
The only point that my unmet need differs from another need might be the total
price of the purchases since medicine might not even cost you more than $20.
Why: an
underlying cause that the outsiders’ need might be price since some individuals
may not want to spend an extra 20%-40% of their medicine price only for it to
be delivered.
Inside
Boundary
|
Outside
Boundary
|
Who: middle to high income Baby Boomers
|
Who: Young, energized, and with lots of leisure
|
What: delivery convenience
|
What: extra 20%-40%
of total purchase
|
Why: convenience by saving time
|
Why: might find it unnecessary to pay extra for
delivery.
|
Nicolas, I still think your opportunity is a great idea and it was very interesting to hear your perspective on who is actually outside of this boundary. I do agree that your products necessity does have a lot to do with "laziness" as you described people outside your boundary as "young, energized, and with lots of leisure." Honestly though, laziness is something so many kids we know suffer from, so it still seems like a great idea. Convenience is always a great thing. Great job.
ReplyDelete